Great research starts with great data.

Learn More
More >
Patent Analysis of

Read-if-not-revision-equals protocol message

Updated Time 12 June 2019

Patent Registration Data

Publication Number

US10002047

Application Number

US15/282920

Application Date

30 September 2016

Publication Date

19 June 2018

Current Assignee

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION

Original Assignee (Applicant)

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION

International Classification

G06F11/10,G06F11/30,G06F11/32,H04L29/06

Cooperative Classification

G06F11/1092,G06F11/1076,G06F11/3034,G06F11/327,H04L63/0428

Inventor

DHUSE, GREG R.,VOLVOVSKI, ILYA

Patent Images

This patent contains figures and images illustrating the invention and its embodiment.

US10002047 Read-if-not-revision-equals protocol message 1 US10002047 Read-if-not-revision-equals protocol message 2 US10002047 Read-if-not-revision-equals protocol message 3
See all images <>

Abstract

A method for a dispersed storage network begins by receiving one of at least a threshold number of DSTN concurrency requests that includes a header section and a payload section. The method continues by determining, in response to the one of at least the threshold number of DSTN concurrency requests, a most recent slice revision number based on a slice name contained in the slice name section. The method continues by determining whether the last known revision number is less than the most recent revision number. The method continues by generating a DSTN concurrency response to return at least one slice of a greater revision number than the last known revision number of the request. The method continues by determining whether an error condition exists and generating an DSTN concurrency response to indicate that an unfavorable revision mismatch does not exist.

Read more

Claims

1. A method for execution by one or more processing modules of one or more computing devices of a dispersed storage network (DSN), the method comprises: receiving one of at least a threshold number of DSTN concurrency requests that includes a header section and a payload section, wherein the payload section includes a transaction number, a last known slice revision number, and a slice name section; determining, in response to the one of at least a threshold number of DSTN concurrency requests, a most recent slice revision number based on a slice name contained in the slice name section; determining whether the last known slice revision number is less than the most recent slice revision number; when the last known slice revision number is less than the most recent slice revision number, generating a DSTN concurrency response to return at least one slice of a greater revision number than the last known slice revision number of the DSTN concurrency request, the generating the DSTN concurrency response including generating a header section and a payload section, wherein the payload section includes a favorable slice revision status indication and one or more of: a slice revision count regarding the slice name and one or more slice revision numbers corresponding to the slice name; when the last known slice revision number is not less than the most recent slice revision number, generating the DSTN concurrency response to indicate that an unfavorable slice revision mismatch does not exist; determining whether an error condition exists; and discarding the DSTN concurrency response when the error condition exists; and outputting the DSTN concurrency response when the error condition does not exist.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprises accessing an associate memory based on the slice name contained in the slice name section to retrieve a list of slice revision numbers corresponding to the slice name.

3. The method of claim 1 further comprises identifying a greatest slice revision number as the most recent slice revision number.

4. The method of claim 1 further comprises the generating a DSTN concurrency response including generating a response header section and a response payload section, wherein the response payload section includes a slice revision mismatch status indication.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the slice revision mismatch status indication is based on the last known slice revision number not being current.

6. The method of claim 1 further comprises the generating a DSTN concurrency response including generating a response header section and a response payload section, wherein the response payload section includes a slice revision count regarding the slice name.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the slice revision count includes a number of available encoded data slices associated with the slice name.

8. The method of claim 1 further comprises the generating a DSTN concurrency response including generating a response header section and a response payload section, wherein the response payload section includes one or more slice revision numbers corresponding to the slice name, one or more slice lengths corresponding to the slice name, or one or more encoded data slices corresponding to the slice name.

9. The method of claim 1 further comprises the generating the DSTN concurrency response including generating a response payload section to include one or more of an encoded data slice corresponding to the most recent slice revision number, all input data slices associated with slice revision numbers that are greater than the last known slice revision number, and all encoded data slices corresponding to the slice name.

10. The method of claim 1 further comprises the generating the DSTN concurrency response including determining which encoded data slices to include in a response payload section based on at least one of: a predetermination, a response type indicator of the DSTN concurrency request, a difference between the most recent slice revision number and the last known slice revision number, or a system activity level indicator.

11. The method of claim 1 further comprises not returning encoded data slices when the most recent slice revision number is less than or equal to the last known slice revision number.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein each header section includes a payload length field and at least one of: an operation code field, a protocol class field, or a protocol class version field.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the payload length field includes a length of the payload section, the operation code field includes a concurrency response operation code, the protocol class field includes a protocol class for the concurrency response operation code, and the protocol class version field includes a version of the concurrency response operation code.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein the discarding the DSTN concurrency response is based on one or more of: the slice name being associated with a locked encoded data slice state, a transaction number error, the slice name is associated with one or more encoded data slices that are unavailable, or one of at least the threshold number of DSTN concurrency requests is not authorized.

15. A computing device of a group of computing devices of a dispersed storage network (DSN), the computing device comprises: an interface; a local memory; anda processing module operably coupled to the interface and the local memory, wherein the processing module functions to: receive one of at least a threshold number of DSTN concurrency requests that includes at least a last known slice revision number and a slice name; determine, in response to the one of at least the threshold number of DSTN concurrency requests, a most recent slice revision number based on the slice name; determine whether the last known slice revision number is less than the most recent slice revision number; when the last known slice revision number is less than the most recent slice revision number, generate a DSTN concurrency response to return at least one slice of a greater slice revision number than the last known slice revision number of the DSTN concurrency request, the generating the DSTN concurrency response including generating a header section and a payload section, wherein the payload section includes a favorable slice revision status indication and one or more of: a slice revision count regarding the slice name and one or more slice revision numbers corresponding to the slice name; when the last known slice revision number is not less than the most recent slice revision number, generate the DSTN concurrency response to indicate that an unfavorable slice revision mismatch does not exist; determining whether an error condition exists; and discarding the DSTN concurrency response when the error condition exists; and outputting the DSTN concurrency response when the error condition does not exist.

16. The computing device of claim 15 further comprises accessing an associate memory based on the slice name contained in a slice name section to retrieve a list of slice revision numbers corresponding to the slice name.

17. The computing device of claim 15 further comprises identifying a greatest slice revision number as the most recent slice revision number.

18. The computing device of claim 15 further comprises the generating the DSTN concurrency response including generating a header section and a payload section, wherein the payload section includes a slice revision mismatch status indication based on the last known slice revision number not being current.

Read more

Claim Tree

  • 1
    1. A method for execution by one or more processing modules of one or more computing devices of a dispersed storage network (DSN), the method comprises:
    • receiving one of at least a threshold number of DSTN concurrency requests that includes a header section and a payload section, wherein the payload section includes a transaction number, a last known slice revision number, and a slice name section
    • determining, in response to the one of at least a threshold number of DSTN concurrency requests, a most recent slice revision number based on a slice name contained in the slice name section
    • determining whether the last known slice revision number is less than the most recent slice revision number
    • when the last known slice revision number is less than the most recent slice revision number, generating a DSTN concurrency response to return at least one slice of a greater revision number than the last known slice revision number of the DSTN concurrency request, the generating the DSTN concurrency response including generating a header section and a payload section, wherein the payload section includes a favorable slice revision status indication and one or more of: a slice revision count regarding the slice name and one or more slice revision numbers corresponding to the slice name
    • when the last known slice revision number is not less than the most recent slice revision number, generating the DSTN concurrency response to indicate that an unfavorable slice revision mismatch does not exist
    • determining whether an error condition exists
    • and discarding the DSTN concurrency response when the error condition exists
    • and outputting the DSTN concurrency response when the error condition does not exist.
    • 2. The method of claim 1 further comprises
      • accessing an associate memory based on the slice name contained in the slice name section to retrieve a list of slice revision numbers corresponding to the slice name.
    • 3. The method of claim 1 further comprises
      • identifying a greatest slice revision number as the most recent slice revision number.
    • 4. The method of claim 1 further comprises
      • the generating a DSTN concurrency response including generating a response header section and a response payload section, wherein the response payload section includes a slice revision mismatch status indication.
    • 6. The method of claim 1 further comprises
      • the generating a DSTN concurrency response including generating a response header section and a response payload section, wherein the response payload section includes a slice revision count regarding the slice name.
    • 8. The method of claim 1 further comprises
      • the generating a DSTN concurrency response including generating a response header section and a response payload section, wherein the response payload section includes one or more slice revision numbers corresponding to the slice name, one or more slice lengths corresponding to the slice name, or one or more encoded data slices corresponding to the slice name.
    • 9. The method of claim 1 further comprises
      • the generating the DSTN concurrency response including generating a response payload section to include one or more of an encoded data slice corresponding to the most recent slice revision number, all input data slices associated with slice revision numbers that are greater than the last known slice revision number, and all encoded data slices corresponding to the slice name.
    • 10. The method of claim 1 further comprises
      • the generating the DSTN concurrency response including determining which encoded data slices to include in a response payload section based on at least one of: a predetermination, a response type indicator of the DSTN concurrency request, a difference between the most recent slice revision number and the last known slice revision number, or a system activity level indicator.
    • 11. The method of claim 1 further comprises
      • not returning encoded data slices when the most recent slice revision number is less than or equal to the last known slice revision number.
    • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein
      • each header section includes a payload length field and at least one of: an operation code field, a protocol class field, or a protocol class version field.
    • 14. The method of claim 1, wherein
      • the discarding the DSTN concurrency response is based on one or more of: the slice name being associated with a locked encoded data slice state, a transaction number error, the slice name is associated with one or more encoded data slices that are unavailable, or one of at least the threshold number of DSTN concurrency requests is not authorized.
  • 15
    15. A computing device of a group of computing devices of a dispersed storage network (DSN), the computing device comprises:
    • an interface
    • a local memory
    • anda processing module operably coupled to the interface and the local memory, wherein the processing module functions to: receive one of at least a threshold number of DSTN concurrency requests that includes at least a last known slice revision number and a slice name
    • determine, in response to the one of at least the threshold number of DSTN concurrency requests, a most recent slice revision number based on the slice name
    • determine whether the last known slice revision number is less than the most recent slice revision number
    • when the last known slice revision number is less than the most recent slice revision number, generate a DSTN concurrency response to return at least one slice of a greater slice revision number than the last known slice revision number of the DSTN concurrency request, the generating the DSTN concurrency response including generating a header section and a payload section, wherein the payload section includes a favorable slice revision status indication and one or more of: a slice revision count regarding the slice name and one or more slice revision numbers corresponding to the slice name
    • when the last known slice revision number is not less than the most recent slice revision number, generate the DSTN concurrency response to indicate that an unfavorable slice revision mismatch does not exist
    • determining whether an error condition exists
    • and discarding the DSTN concurrency response when the error condition exists
    • and outputting the DSTN concurrency response when the error condition does not exist.
    • 16. The computing device of claim 15 further comprises
      • accessing an associate memory based on the slice name contained in a slice name section to retrieve a list of slice revision numbers corresponding to the slice name.
    • 17. The computing device of claim 15 further comprises
      • identifying a greatest slice revision number as the most recent slice revision number.
    • 18. The computing device of claim 15 further comprises
      • the generating the DSTN concurrency response including generating a header section and a payload section, wherein the payload section includes a slice revision mismatch status indication based on the last known slice revision number not being current.
See all independent claims <>

Description

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

Not applicable.

INCORPORATION-BY-REFERENCE OF MATERIAL SUBMITTED ON A COMPACT DISC

Not applicable.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Technical Field of the Invention

This invention relates generally to computer networks and more particularly to dispersing error encoded data.

Description of Related Art

Computing devices are known to communicate data, process data, and/or store data. Such computing devices range from wireless smart phones, laptops, tablets, personal computers (PC), work stations, and video game devices, to data centers that support millions of web searches, stock trades, or on-line purchases every day. In general, a computing device includes a central processing unit (CPU), a memory system, user input/output interfaces, peripheral device interfaces, and an interconnecting bus structure.

As is further known, a computer may effectively extend its CPU by using “cloud computing” to perform one or more computing functions (e.g., a service, an application, an algorithm, an arithmetic logic function, etc.) on behalf of the computer. Further, for large services, applications, and/or functions, cloud computing may be performed by multiple cloud computing resources in a distributed manner to improve the response time for completion of the service, application, and/or function. For example, Hadoop is an open source software framework that supports distributed applications enabling application execution by thousands of computers.

In addition to cloud computing, a computer may use “cloud storage” as part of its memory system. As is known, cloud storage enables a user, via its computer, to store files, applications, etc. on an Internet storage system. The Internet storage system may include a RAID (redundant array of independent disks) system and/or a dispersed storage system that uses an error correction scheme to encode data for storage.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING(S)

FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of an embodiment of a dispersed or distributed storage network (DSN) in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram of an embodiment of a computing core in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a schematic block diagram of an example of dispersed storage error encoding of data in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 4 is a schematic block diagram of a generic example of an error encoding function in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 5 is a schematic block diagram of a specific example of an error encoding function in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 6 is a schematic block diagram of an example of a slice name of an encoded data slice (EDS) in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 7 is a schematic block diagram of an example of dispersed storage error decoding of data in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 8 is a schematic block diagram of a generic example of an error decoding function in accordance with the present invention; and

FIG. 9 is a flowchart illustrating an example of synchronizing distributed storage and task (DSTN) network data in accordance with the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of an embodiment of a dispersed, or distributed, storage network (DSN) 10 that includes a plurality of computing devices 12-16, a managing unit 18, an integrity processing unit 20, and a DSN memory 22. The components of the DSN 10 are coupled to a network 24, which may include one or more wireless and/or wire lined communication systems; one or more non-public intranet systems and/or public internet systems; and/or one or more local area networks (LAN) and/or wide area networks (WAN).

The DSN memory 22 includes a plurality of storage units 36 that may be located at geographically different sites (e.g., one in Chicago, one in Milwaukee, etc.), at a common site, or a combination thereof. For example, if the DSN memory 22 includes eight storage units 36, each storage unit is located at a different site. As another example, if the DSN memory 22 includes eight storage units 36, all eight storage units are located at the same site. As yet another example, if the DSN memory 22 includes eight storage units 36, a first pair of storage units are at a first common site, a second pair of storage units are at a second common site, a third pair of storage units are at a third common site, and a fourth pair of storage units are at a fourth common site. Note that a DSN memory 22 may include more or less than eight storage units 36. Further note that each storage unit 36 includes a computing core (as shown in FIG. 2, or components thereof) and a plurality of memory devices for storing dispersed error encoded data.

Each of the computing devices 12-16, the managing unit 18, and the integrity processing unit 20 include a computing core 26, which includes network interfaces 30-33. Computing devices 12-16 may each be a portable computing device and/or a fixed computing device. A portable computing device may be a social networking device, a gaming device, a cell phone, a smart phone, a digital assistant, a digital music player, a digital video player, a laptop computer, a handheld computer, a tablet, a video game controller, and/or any other portable device that includes a computing core. A fixed computing device may be a computer (PC), a computer server, a cable set-top box, a satellite receiver, a television set, a printer, a fax machine, home entertainment equipment, a video game console, and/or any type of home or office computing equipment. Note that each of the managing unit 18 and the integrity processing unit 20 may be separate computing devices, may be a common computing device, and/or may be integrated into one or more of the computing devices 12-16 and/or into one or more of the storage units 36.

Each interface 30, 32, and 33 includes software and hardware to support one or more communication links via the network 24 indirectly and/or directly. For example, interface 30 supports a communication link (e.g., wired, wireless, direct, via a LAN, via the network 24, etc.) between computing devices 14 and 16. As another example, interface 32 supports communication links (e.g., a wired connection, a wireless connection, a LAN connection, and/or any other type of connection to/from the network 24) between computing devices 12&16 and the DSN memory 22. As yet another example, interface 33 supports a communication link for each of the managing unit 18 and the integrity processing unit 20 to the network 24.

Computing devices 12 and 16 include a dispersed storage (DS) client module 34, which enables the computing device to dispersed storage error encode and decode data as subsequently described with reference to one or more of FIGS. 3-8. In this example embodiment, computing device 16 functions as a dispersed storage processing agent for computing device 14. In this role, computing device 16 dispersed storage error encodes and decodes data on behalf of computing device 14. With the use of dispersed storage error encoding and decoding, the DSN 10 is tolerant of a significant number of storage unit failures (the number of failures is based on parameters of the dispersed storage error encoding function) without loss of data and without the need for a redundant or backup copies of the data. Further, the DSN 10 stores data for an indefinite period of time without data loss and in a secure manner (e.g., the system is very resistant to unauthorized attempts at accessing the data).

In operation, the managing unit 18 performs DS management services. For example, the managing unit 18 establishes distributed data storage parameters (e.g., vault creation, distributed storage parameters, security parameters, billing information, user profile information, etc.) for computing devices 12-14 individually or as part of a group of user devices. As a specific example, the managing unit 18 coordinates creation of a vault (e.g., a virtual memory block associated with a portion of an overall namespace of the DSN) within the DSTN memory 22 for a user device, a group of devices, or for public access and establishes per vault dispersed storage (DS) error encoding parameters for a vault. The managing unit 18 facilitates storage of DS error encoding parameters for each vault by updating registry information of the DSN 10, where the registry information may be stored in the DSN memory 22, a computing device 12-16, the managing unit 18, and/or the integrity processing unit 20.

The DSN managing unit 18 creates and stores user profile information (e.g., an access control list (ACL)) in local memory and/or within memory of the DSN memory 22. The user profile information includes authentication information, permissions, and/or the security parameters. The security parameters may include encryption/decryption scheme, one or more encryption keys, key generation scheme, and/or data encoding/decoding scheme.

The DSN managing unit 18 creates billing information for a particular user, a user group, a vault access, public vault access, etc. For instance, the DSTN managing unit 18 tracks the number of times a user accesses a non-public vault and/or public vaults, which can be used to generate per-access billing information. In another instance, the DSTN managing unit 18 tracks the amount of data stored and/or retrieved by a user device and/or a user group, which can be used to generate per-data-amount billing information.

As another example, the managing unit 18 performs network operations, network administration, and/or network maintenance. Network operations includes authenticating user data allocation requests (e.g., read and/or write requests), managing creation of vaults, establishing authentication credentials for user devices, adding/deleting components (e.g., user devices, storage units, and/or computing devices with a DS client module 34) to/from the DSN 10, and/or establishing authentication credentials for the storage units 36. Network administration includes monitoring devices and/or units for failures, maintaining vault information, determining device and/or unit activation status, determining device and/or unit loading, and/or determining any other system level operation that affects the performance level of the DSN 10. Network maintenance includes facilitating replacing, upgrading, repairing, and/or expanding a device and/or unit of the DSN 10.

The integrity processing unit 20 performs rebuilding of ‘bad’ or missing encoded data slices. At a high level, the integrity processing unit 20 performs rebuilding by periodically attempting to retrieve/list encoded data slices, and/or slice names of the encoded data slices, from the DSN memory 22. For retrieved encoded slices, they are checked for errors due to data corruption, outdated version, etc. If a slice includes an error, it is flagged as a ‘bad’ slice. For encoded data slices that were not received and/or not listed, they are flagged as missing slices. Bad and/or missing slices are subsequently rebuilt using other retrieved encoded data slices that are deemed to be good slices to produce rebuilt slices. The rebuilt slices are stored in the DSTN memory 22.

FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram of an embodiment of a computing core 26 that includes a processing module 50, a memory controller 52, main memory 54, a video graphics processing unit 55, an input/output (IO) controller 56, a peripheral component interconnect (PCI) interface 58, an IO interface module 60, at least one IO device interface module 62, a read only memory (ROM) basic input output system (BIOS) 64, and one or more memory interface modules. The one or more memory interface module(s) includes one or more of a universal serial bus (USB) interface module 66, a host bus adapter (HBA) interface module 68, a network interface module 70, a flash interface module 72, a hard drive interface module 74, and a DSN interface module 76.

The DSN interface module 76 functions to mimic a conventional operating system (OS) file system interface (e.g., network file system (NFS), flash file system (FFS), disk file system (DFS), file transfer protocol (FTP), web-based distributed authoring and versioning (WebDAV), etc.) and/or a block memory interface (e.g., small computer system interface (SCSI), internet small computer system interface (iSCSI), etc.). The DSN interface module 76 and/or the network interface module 70 may function as one or more of the interface 30-33 of FIG. 1. Note that the IO device interface module 62 and/or the memory interface modules 66-76 may be collectively or individually referred to as IO ports.

FIG. 3 is a schematic block diagram of an example of dispersed storage error encoding of data. When a computing device 12 or 16 has data to store it disperse storage error encodes the data in accordance with a dispersed storage error encoding process based on dispersed storage error encoding parameters. The dispersed storage error encoding parameters include an encoding function (e.g., information dispersal algorithm, Reed-Solomon, Cauchy Reed-Solomon, systematic encoding, non-systematic encoding, on-line codes, etc.), a data segmenting protocol (e.g., data segment size, fixed, variable, etc.), and per data segment encoding values. The per data segment encoding values include a total, or pillar width, number (T) of encoded data slices per encoding of a data segment i.e., in a set of encoded data slices); a decode threshold number (D) of encoded data slices of a set of encoded data slices that are needed to recover the data segment; a read threshold number (R) of encoded data slices to indicate a number of encoded data slices per set to be read from storage for decoding of the data segment; and/or a write threshold number (W) to indicate a number of encoded data slices per set that must be accurately stored before the encoded data segment is deemed to have been properly stored. The dispersed storage error encoding parameters may further include slicing information (e.g., the number of encoded data slices that will be created for each data segment) and/or slice security information (e.g., per encoded data slice encryption, compression, integrity checksum, etc.).

In the present example, Cauchy Reed-Solomon has been selected as the encoding function (a generic example is shown in FIG. 4 and a specific example is shown in FIG. 5); the data segmenting protocol is to divide the data object into fixed sized data segments; and the per data segment encoding values include: a pillar width of 5, a decode threshold of 3, a read threshold of 4, and a write threshold of 4. In accordance with the data segmenting protocol, the computing device 12 or 16 divides the data (e.g., a file (e.g., text, video, audio, etc.), a data object, or other data arrangement) into a plurality of fixed sized data segments (e.g., 1 through Y of a fixed size in range of Kilo-bytes to Tera-bytes or more). The number of data segments created is dependent of the size of the data and the data segmenting protocol.

The computing device 12 or 16 then disperse storage error encodes a data segment using the selected encoding function (e.g., Cauchy Reed-Solomon) to produce a set of encoded data slices. FIG. 4 illustrates a generic Cauchy Reed-Solomon encoding function, which includes an encoding matrix (EM), a data matrix (DM), and a coded matrix (CM). The size of the encoding matrix (EM) is dependent on the pillar width number (T) and the decode threshold number (D) of selected per data segment encoding values. To produce the data matrix (DM), the data segment is divided into a plurality of data blocks and the data blocks are arranged into D number of rows with Z data blocks per row. Note that Z is a function of the number of data blocks created from the data segment and the decode threshold number (D). The coded matrix is produced by matrix multiplying the data matrix by the encoding matrix.

FIG. 5 illustrates a specific example of Cauchy Reed-Solomon encoding with a pillar number (T) of five and decode threshold number of three. In this example, a first data segment is divided into twelve data blocks (D1-D12). The coded matrix includes five rows of coded data blocks, where the first row of X11-X14 corresponds to a first encoded data slice (EDS 1_1), the second row of X21-X24 corresponds to a second encoded data slice (EDS 2_1), the third row of X31-X34 corresponds to a third encoded data slice (EDS 3_1), the fourth row of X41-X44 corresponds to a fourth encoded data slice (EDS 4_1), and the fifth row of X51-X54 corresponds to a fifth encoded data slice (EDS 5_1). Note that the second number of the EDS designation corresponds to the data segment number.

Returning to the discussion of FIG. 3, the computing device also creates a slice name (SN) for each encoded data slice (EDS) in the set of encoded data slices. A typical format for a slice name 60 is shown in FIG. 6. As shown, the slice name (SN) 60 includes a pillar number of the encoded data slice (e.g., one of 1−T), a data segment number (e.g., one of 1−Y), a vault identifier (ID), a data object identifier (ID), and may further include revision level information of the encoded data slices. The slice name functions as, at least part of, a DSN address for the encoded data slice for storage and retrieval from the DSN memory 22.

As a result of encoding, the computing device 12 or 16 produces a plurality of sets of encoded data slices, which are provided with their respective slice names to the storage units for storage. As shown, the first set of encoded data slices includes EDS 1_1 through EDS 5_1 and the first set of slice names includes SN 1_1 through SN 5_1 and the last set of encoded data slices includes EDS 1_Y through EDS 5_Y and the last set of slice names includes SN 1_Y through SN 5_Y.

FIG. 7 is a schematic block diagram of an example of dispersed storage error decoding of a data object that was dispersed storage error encoded and stored in the example of FIG. 4. In this example, the computing device 12 or 16 retrieves from the storage units at least the decode threshold number of encoded data slices per data segment. As a specific example, the computing device retrieves a read threshold number of encoded data slices.

To recover a data segment from a decode threshold number of encoded data slices, the computing device uses a decoding function as shown in FIG. 8. As shown, the decoding function is essentially an inverse of the encoding function of FIG. 4. The coded matrix includes a decode threshold number of rows (e.g., three in this example) and the decoding matrix in an inversion of the encoding matrix that includes the corresponding rows of the coded matrix. For example, if the coded matrix includes rows 1, 2, and 4, the encoding matrix is reduced to rows 1, 2, and 4, and then inverted to produce the decoding matrix.

In at least one embodiment, a revision is specified along with a slice name for a read. The server returns any slices for that source that do not match that revision, however only a “check succeeded” message is returned for slices that match the given revision. This message can simplify cache validation and removes a RTT from that operation. “If the revision supplied is greater than or equal to the highest revision known by the store, do not return the slice”.

FIG. 9 is a flowchart illustrating an example of synchronizing distributed storage and task (DSTN) network data. In particular, a method is presented for use in conjunction with one or more functions and features described in conjunction with FIGS. 1-2, 3-8, and also FIG. 9. The synchronizing may include generating a DSTN data concurrency response message to support a checked read response operation.

The method begins at a step 902 where processing module (e.g., of a distributed storage and task (DST) execution unit) receives one of at least a threshold number of DSTN concurrency requests that includes a header section and a payload section, wherein the payload section includes a transaction number, a last known slice revision number, and a slice name section. The method continues at the step 904 where, in response to the one of at least the threshold number of DSTN concurrency requests, the processing module determines a most recent slice revision number based on a slice name contained in the slice name section. For example, the processing module accesses an associate memory based on the slice name contained in the slice name section to retrieve a list of slice revision numbers corresponding to the slice name. Next, processing module identifies a greatest slice revision number as the most recent slice revision number.

The method continues at step 906 where the processing module determines whether the last known revision number is less than the most recent revision number. When the last known revision number is less than the most recent revision number (e.g., the most recent revision number is greater than the last known revision number), the method continues at the step 908 where the processing module generates a DSTN concurrency response to return at least one slice of a greater revision number than the last known revision number of the request. The generating includes generating a header section and a payload section, wherein the payload section includes a revision mismatch status indication (e.g., indicating that the last known revision number is not current), the slice revision count regarding the slice name (e.g., the number of available encoded data slices associated with the slice name), one or more slice revision numbers corresponding to the slice name, one or more slice lengths corresponding to the slice name, and one or more encoded data slices corresponding to the slice name. The generating may further include generating the payload section to include one or more of an encoded data slice corresponding to the most recent revision number, all input data slices associated with revision numbers that are greater than the last known revision number, and all encoded data slices corresponding to the slice name. The generating may further include determining which encoded data slices to include in the payload section based on at least one of a predetermination, a response type indicator of the DSTN concurrency request, a difference between the most recent revision number and the last known revision number, and a system activity level indicator. The method branches to the step 912 where the processing module determines whether an error condition exists

When the last known revision number is not less than the most recent revision number (e.g., the most recent revision number is less than or equal to the last known revision number), the method continues at step 910 where the processing module generates the DSTN concurrency response to indicate that an unfavorable revision mismatch does not exist. The generating includes generating a header section and a payload section, wherein the payload section includes a favorable revision status indication (e.g., indicating that the last known revision number is current) and one or more of the slice revision count regarding the slice name (e.g., the number of available encoded data slices associated with the slice name) and one or more slice revision numbers corresponding to the slice name. As such, the processing module does return encoded data slices when the most recent revision number is less than or equal to the last known revision number.

Each header section includes a payload length field and at least one of an operation code field, a protocol class field, and a protocol class version field, wherein, the payload length field includes a length of the payload section, the operation code field includes a concurrency response operation code, the protocol class field includes a protocol class for the concurrency response operation code, and the protocol class version field includes a version of the concurrency response operation code.

The method continues at step 912 where the processing module determines whether an error condition exists based on one or more of the slice name being associated with a locked encoded data slice state, a transaction number error, the slice name is associated with one or more encoded data slices that are unavailable, and one of at least the threshold number of DSTN concurrency requests is not authorized. The method continues at the step 914 where the processing module discards the DSTN concurrency response when the error condition exists.

The method continues at step 916 where the processing module outputs the DSTN concurrency response (e.g., to a requesting entity) when the error condition does not exist.

The method described above in conjunction with the processing module can alternatively be performed by other modules of the dispersed storage network or by other computing devices. In addition, at least one memory section (e.g., a non-transitory computer readable storage medium) that stores operational instructions can, when executed by one or more processing modules of one or more computing devices of the dispersed storage network (DSN), cause the one or more computing devices to perform any or all of the method steps described above.

It is noted that terminologies as may be used herein such as bit stream, stream, signal sequence, etc. (or their equivalents) have been used interchangeably to describe digital information whose content corresponds to any of a number of desired types (e.g., data, video, speech, audio, etc. any of which may generally be referred to as ‘data’).

As may be used herein, the terms “substantially” and “approximately” provides an industry-accepted tolerance for its corresponding term and/or relativity between items. Such an industry-accepted tolerance ranges from less than one percent to fifty percent and corresponds to, but is not limited to, component values, integrated circuit process variations, temperature variations, rise and fall times, and/or thermal noise. Such relativity between items ranges from a difference of a few percent to magnitude differences. As may also be used herein, the term(s) “configured to”, “operably coupled to”, “coupled to”, and/or “coupling” includes direct coupling between items and/or indirect coupling between items via an intervening item (e.g., an item includes, but is not limited to, a component, an element, a circuit, and/or a module) where, for an example of indirect coupling, the intervening item does not modify the information of a signal but may adjust its current level, voltage level, and/or power level. As may further be used herein, inferred coupling (i.e., where one element is coupled to another element by inference) includes direct and indirect coupling between two items in the same manner as “coupled to”. As may even further be used herein, the term “configured to”, “operable to”, “coupled to”, or “operably coupled to” indicates that an item includes one or more of power connections, input(s), output(s), etc., to perform, when activated, one or more its corresponding functions and may further include inferred coupling to one or more other items. As may still further be used herein, the term “associated with”, includes direct and/or indirect coupling of separate items and/or one item being embedded within another item.

As may be used herein, the term “compares favorably”, indicates that a comparison between two or more items, signals, etc., provides a desired relationship. For example, when the desired relationship is that signal 1 has a greater magnitude than signal 2, a favorable comparison may be achieved when the magnitude of signal 1 is greater than that of signal 2 or when the magnitude of signal 2 is less than that of signal 1. As may be used herein, the term “compares unfavorably”, indicates that a comparison between two or more items, signals, etc., fails to provide the desired relationship.

As may also be used herein, the terms “processing module”, “processing circuit”, “processor”, and/or “processing unit” may be a single processing device or a plurality of processing devices. Such a processing device may be a microprocessor, micro-controller, digital signal processor, microcomputer, central processing unit, field programmable gate array, programmable logic device, state machine, logic circuitry, analog circuitry, digital circuitry, and/or any device that manipulates signals (analog and/or digital) based on hard coding of the circuitry and/or operational instructions. The processing module, module, processing circuit, and/or processing unit may be, or further include, memory and/or an integrated memory element, which may be a single memory device, a plurality of memory devices, and/or embedded circuitry of another processing module, module, processing circuit, and/or processing unit. Such a memory device may be a read-only memory, random access memory, volatile memory, non-volatile memory, static memory, dynamic memory, flash memory, cache memory, and/or any device that stores digital information. Note that if the processing module, module, processing circuit, and/or processing unit includes more than one processing device, the processing devices may be centrally located (e.g., directly coupled together via a wired and/or wireless bus structure) or may be distributedly located (e.g., cloud computing via indirect coupling via a local area network and/or a wide area network). Further note that if the processing module, module, processing circuit, and/or processing unit implements one or more of its functions via a state machine, analog circuitry, digital circuitry, and/or logic circuitry, the memory and/or memory element storing the corresponding operational instructions may be embedded within, or external to, the circuitry comprising the state machine, analog circuitry, digital circuitry, and/or logic circuitry. Still further note that, the memory element may store, and the processing module, module, processing circuit, and/or processing unit executes, hard coded and/or operational instructions corresponding to at least some of the steps and/or functions illustrated in one or more of the Figures. Such a memory device or memory element can be included in an article of manufacture.

One or more embodiments have been described above with the aid of method steps illustrating the performance of specified functions and relationships thereof. The boundaries and sequence of these functional building blocks and method steps have been arbitrarily defined herein for convenience of description. Alternate boundaries and sequences can be defined so long as the specified functions and relationships are appropriately performed. Any such alternate boundaries or sequences are thus within the scope and spirit of the claims. Further, the boundaries of these functional building blocks have been arbitrarily defined for convenience of description. Alternate boundaries could be defined as long as the certain significant functions are appropriately performed. Similarly, flow diagram blocks may also have been arbitrarily defined herein to illustrate certain significant functionality.

To the extent used, the flow diagram block boundaries and sequence could have been defined otherwise and still perform the certain significant functionality. Such alternate definitions of both functional building blocks and flow diagram blocks and sequences are thus within the scope and spirit of the claims. One of average skill in the art will also recognize that the functional building blocks, and other illustrative blocks, modules and components herein, can be implemented as illustrated or by discrete components, application specific integrated circuits, processors executing appropriate software and the like or any combination thereof.

In addition, a flow diagram may include a “start” and/or “continue” indication. The “start” and “continue” indications reflect that the steps presented can optionally be incorporated in or otherwise used in conjunction with other routines. In this context, “start” indicates the beginning of the first step presented and may be preceded by other activities not specifically shown. Further, the “continue” indication reflects that the steps presented may be performed multiple times and/or may be succeeded by other activities not specifically shown. Further, while a flow diagram indicates a particular ordering of steps, other orderings are likewise possible provided that the principles of causality are maintained.

The one or more embodiments are used herein to illustrate one or more aspects, one or more features, one or more concepts, and/or one or more examples. A physical embodiment of an apparatus, an article of manufacture, a machine, and/or of a process may include one or more of the aspects, features, concepts, examples, etc. described with reference to one or more of the embodiments discussed herein. Further, from figure to figure, the embodiments may incorporate the same or similarly named functions, steps, modules, etc. that may use the same or different reference numbers and, as such, the functions, steps, modules, etc. may be the same or similar functions, steps, modules, etc. or different ones.

Unless specifically stated to the contra, signals to, from, and/or between elements in a figure of any of the figures presented herein may be analog or digital, continuous time or discrete time, and single-ended or differential. For instance, if a signal path is shown as a single-ended path, it also represents a differential signal path. Similarly, if a signal path is shown as a differential path, it also represents a single-ended signal path. While one or more particular architectures are described herein, other architectures can likewise be implemented that use one or more data buses not expressly shown, direct connectivity between elements, and/or indirect coupling between other elements as recognized by one of average skill in the art.

The term “module” is used in the description of one or more of the embodiments. A module implements one or more functions via a device such as a processor or other processing device or other hardware that may include or operate in association with a memory that stores operational instructions. A module may operate independently and/or in conjunction with software and/or firmware. As also used herein, a module may contain one or more sub-modules, each of which may be one or more modules.

As may further be used herein, a computer readable memory includes one or more memory elements. A memory element may be a separate memory device, multiple memory devices, or a set of memory locations within a memory device. Such a memory device may be a read-only memory, random access memory, volatile memory, non-volatile memory, static memory, dynamic memory, flash memory, cache memory, and/or any device that stores digital information. The memory device may be in a form a solid state memory, a hard drive memory, cloud memory, thumb drive, server memory, computing device memory, and/or other physical medium for storing digital information.

While particular combinations of various functions and features of the one or more embodiments have been expressly described herein, other combinations of these features and functions are likewise possible. The present disclosure is not limited by the particular examples disclosed herein and expressly incorporates these other combinations.

Read more
PatSnap Solutions

Great research starts with great data.

Use the most comprehensive innovation intelligence platform to maximise ROI on research.

Learn More

Patent Valuation

$

Reveal the value <>

34.0/100 Score

Market Attractiveness

It shows from an IP point of view how many competitors are active and innovations are made in the different technical fields of the company. On a company level, the market attractiveness is often also an indicator of how diversified a company is. Here we look into the commercial relevance of the market.

36.0/100 Score

Market Coverage

It shows the sizes of the market that is covered with the IP and in how many countries the IP guarantees protection. It reflects a market size that is potentially addressable with the invented technology/formulation with a legal protection which also includes a freedom to operate. Here we look into the size of the impacted market.

74.0/100 Score

Technology Quality

It shows the degree of innovation that can be derived from a company’s IP. Here we look into ease of detection, ability to design around and significance of the patented feature to the product/service.

94.0/100 Score

Assignee Score

It takes the R&D behavior of the company itself into account that results in IP. During the invention phase, larger companies are considered to assign a higher R&D budget on a certain technology field, these companies have a better influence on their market, on what is marketable and what might lead to a standard.

16.0/100 Score

Legal Score

It shows the legal strength of IP in terms of its degree of protecting effect. Here we look into claim scope, claim breadth, claim quality, stability and priority.

Citation

Patents Cited in This Cited by
Title Current Assignee Application Date Publication Date
Recovery from failures within data processing systems LENOVO (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD. 11 September 2003 28 October 2004
Dynamic data recovery OVERLAND STORAGE, INC. 29 January 2002 07 November 2002
Method and system for disaster recovery of data from a storage device AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE. LIMITED 14 May 2003 18 November 2004
Secured content delivery system and method ILUMIN CORPORATION 01 May 2002 20 February 2003
Distributed fault tolerant and secure storage SHU LI 19 December 2001 01 May 2003
See full citation <>

More like this

Title Current Assignee Application Date Publication Date
Checksum requests of files HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT LP 26 February 2015 01 September 2016
Method and device for transmitting streaming media data SHENZHEN GREATVISION NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. 01 September 2015 09 March 2017
Device and method for data storage using network buffer RAYTHEON APPLIED SIGNAL TECHNOLOGY, INC. 25 March 2016 06 October 2016
Fault-tolerant enterprise object storage system for small objects CISCO TECHNOLOGY, INC. 25 April 2017 02 November 2017
Secure key management in a data storage system MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC 29 April 2016 10 November 2016
Autonomic parity exchange in data storage systems INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION,IBM UNITED KINGDOM LIMITED,IBM (CHINA) INVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED 02 September 2016 04 May 2017
Secure data storage BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 26 January 2017 03 August 2017
Systems and methods for repair redundancy control for large erasure coded data storage QUALCOMM INCORPORATED 27 June 2016 09 March 2017
Distributed data storage method, control device and system HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. 17 June 2015 22 December 2016
Heterogeneous redundant storage array NEXENTA SYSTEMS, INC. 02 September 2010 12 January 2012
Background data reconstruction in a storage device array system FUJITSU LIMITED 15 November 1991 01 September 1998
Transparent hybrid data storage LINKEDIN CORPORATION 09 November 2015 09 March 2017
存储控制装置和方法 富士通株式会社 18 July 2005 04 June 2008
Data storage device monitoring HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P. 23 October 2015 27 April 2017
Data storage system and data storage method TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY 09 December 2014 16 June 2016
Method and data storage device to estimate a number of errors using a convolutional low-density parity-check (LDPC) code SANDISK TECHNOLOGIES LLC 24 February 2017 08 September 2017
Data storage management method and apparatus, and data storage system ZTE CORPORATION 06 April 2017 12 October 2017
Data stripping, allocation and reconstruction AGENCY FOR SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH 26 February 2016 01 September 2016
Distributed storage system data management and security CLOUD CROWDING CORP. 15 March 2017 21 September 2017
See all similar patents <>

More Patents & Intellectual Property

PatSnap Solutions

PatSnap solutions are used by R&D teams, legal and IP professionals, those in business intelligence and strategic planning roles and by research staff at academic institutions globally.

PatSnap Solutions
Search & Analyze
The widest range of IP search tools makes getting the right answers and asking the right questions easier than ever. One click analysis extracts meaningful information on competitors and technology trends from IP data.
Business Intelligence
Gain powerful insights into future technology changes, market shifts and competitor strategies.
Workflow
Manage IP-related processes across multiple teams and departments with integrated collaboration and workflow tools.
Contact Sales
Clsoe
US10002047 Read-if-not-revision-equals protocol message 1 US10002047 Read-if-not-revision-equals protocol message 2 US10002047 Read-if-not-revision-equals protocol message 3